Rainow 5G phone mast plans refused again

Controversial plans for a new 5G mast in open countryside in Rainow have been refused for a second time.

A total of 61 residents, three town and parish councils, and the local Cheshire East councillor objected to the plans.

Higher Hurdsfield Parish Council raised health concerns, expressing serious concern about the potential negative effects of the mast on wildlife and humans due to increased radiation levels. The residents of Woodend Farm, the closest residential property to the proposed site, also objected, clarifying that they did not endorse the application.

The company behind the application, Mobile Broadband Network Limited (MBNL), claimed that the need for the new mast was a result of being issued a Notice to Quit by the landowner of Marksend Quarry, the site of a current telecommunications mast. However, the landowner disputed this claim, stating that they had not asked MBNL to vacate the current site.

Councillor Chris O’Leary and various objections from residents highlighted concerns about the visual impact of the mast on the surrounding rural area. Residents feared it would be an eyesore and harm the character and appearance of the landscape.

Additionally, objections were raised regarding potential harm to local wildlife, plant life, and humans from the 5G mast. Some objections referred to websites spreading fears about the health effects of 5G masts.

Rainow Parish Council and Bollington Town Council also voiced opposition to the plans. Rainow Parish Council challenged the lack of clear evidence justifying the move from the current site, and Bollington Town Council emphasized the need to disguise and blend the mast into the landscape.

The planning officer recommended that prior approval be refused due to the significant visual intrusion and the proposal’s non-compliance with international commission guidelines. The reduction in height from the previous application was deemed insufficient to outweigh the visual harm.

Ultimately, the application was rejected based on its siting, height, appearance, and failure to comply with international commission guidelines.